- File: Luke Awtry
- Caution tape at Burlington High School in 2021
The suit, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Burlington, alleges that PCBs the company made were used in myriad school building materials including caulking, sealants and flooring adhesives. Those materials released chemicals into the air for decades, leading to a hazardous indoor environment, the lawsuit states.
Vermont is in the midst of an ambitious, first-of-its-kind program to test all schools in the state built before 1980 for the airborne chemicals and remediate problems.
Attorney Pietro Lynn filed the suit on behalf of 93 school districts across the state. Lynn's firm, Lynn, Lynn, Blackman and Manitsky, already provides legal services to almost every Vermont school district.
In an interview earlier this week, Lynn said his firm had affiliated with two out-of-state firms who are experts on PCBs to bring the case.
The suit alleges that the presence of PCBs in schools "will require certain districts to make alternative arrangements to provide adequate educational facilties." PCB contamination will also result in remediating, replacing and demolishing facilities at a cost of "many millions of dollars, and in the aggregate hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars," the suit says.
In a written statement, Monsanto said the claim lacks merit.
"We believe the evidence in this case will show that the school districts’ inaction combined with the state’s unprecedented and scientifically unsupported PCB screening levels has cost the state and its taxpayers millions of dollars that they are now trying to recoup by shifting blame to Monsanto," the statement says.
Related Demolition of the Former Burlington High School Starts
The State of Vermont has also filed a suit, alleging that Monsanto should pay damages for contamination of both the state's environment and schools.
Lynn said he supports the AG's lawsuit and that his firm would "collaborate with the state in any way we can."
You can read the suit here:
Comments
Comments are closed.
From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.
To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.
Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.