Gov. Scott, School Leaders Raise Alarm About Next Budget Season | Education | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

News » Education

Gov. Scott, School Leaders Raise Alarm About Next Budget Season

In a letter, Gov. Phil Scott said he was reaching out to school leaders early to try to avoid another round of historic property tax increases next year.

By

Published September 11, 2024 at 11:43 a.m.


FILE: THOM GLUCK
  • File: Thom Gluck
Just weeks after Vermont students returned to school, district administrators and Gov. Phil Scott are raising the alarm about rising costs that could cause budgets and property taxes to soar — again — next year.

In a letter sent on Monday to school leaders, Scott noted that the tax commissioner typically forecasts property tax increases related to education spending in a memo that's known as the "December 1 letter." But after an unprecedented school budget season — during which one-third of spending plans failed on Town Meeting Day — the governor said he wanted to reach out to school leaders even earlier "to help avoid another round of historic property tax increases next year."
Because $69 million of one-time money was taken from the education fund this spring to buy down property taxes, Scott wrote, there is already a large financial gap going into next fiscal year. Additionally, health insurance costs for educators are likely going to rise again this year, which will put more strain on the ed fund. Just those two factors could increase property taxes an average of 7 percent next year — even if school spending stays flat, Scott wrote.

Scott acknowledged that many cost drivers are outside of school districts' control. But, he said, "if we work together, we can stabilize the school budget process, reduce the risk of historically high school budget defeats and revotes, and create capacity for all of us to focus on improving student outcomes and implementing longer-term improvements."

The governor noted that the legislature has created a Commission on the Future of Public Education, which has started meeting to discuss those longer-term fixes. But the group isn't slated to make substantive recommendations about how to improve Vermont's education system until 2026. And those recommendations will take time to implement.

In his letter, Scott encouraged school boards "to consider all options to contain education spending growth" this year, but he did not provide recommendations. Instead, he encouraged superintendents and school business managers to contact the Agency of Education for technical support.
Scott referenced a memo that went out to local school officials last month from the Vermont School Boards Association, Vermont Superintendents Association and Vermont Association of School Business Officials. That document laid out, in more detail, the factors driving up education costs, including staff salaries and benefits, inflation, special education, facilities maintenance, and tuition payments to private schools.



It warned that "Vermont cannot endure" another budget cycle like the one this past year.

"Without successful efforts to significantly reduce the rate of increase in school district spending proposals ... more budgets could fail, leading to statewide proposals designed to suppress spending rather than address costs," the memo said. "This would likely result in increased disparities in education funding across the state."
Some school districts, too, are already prepping for another budget crunch. In an email to faculty and staff on Monday, Adam Bunting, interim superintendent of the Champlain Valley School District, noted that the district cut 42 full-time positions this school year — and residents' property taxes still rose substantially. In order to maintain the current level of services for next year, he wrote, the district would likely have to increase its budget by more than $5 million. Bunting said he was reaching out to engage the community in how to navigate the "extraordinary fiscal headwinds."

South Burlington superintendent Violet Nichols, in a written statement submitted to the Commission on the Future of Public Education, said her district was "alarmed" as it begins budget modeling for next fiscal year.

Last school year, the district applied a $3.2 million surplus to its budget in order to get property tax rate increases down to around 8 percent. But there is no surplus to draw from this year. And, she wrote, the district is anticipating it may have to "drastically cut staffing and programming levels" to achieve a budget that would get voter approval.

"As longer-term solutions are still conceptual," Nichols wrote, "we also need to take direct actions in advance of the FY26 budget development cycle which is already in full force as the doors open for another school year."
candles in the shape of a 29

Light Our Candles?

Seven Days just turned 29. Help us celebrate and make it to 30!

Donate today and become a Super Reader. We’re counting on generous people like you for 129 gifts by September 27.

New: Become a monthly donor or increase your existing recurring donation today and we’ll send you a framable print of our once-in-a-lifetime eclipse cover photographed by James Buck.

Related Stories

Speaking of...

Tags

Comments

Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.