- Anne Wallace Allen ©️ Seven Days
- Vermont Statehouse
Rep. Seth Bongartz (D-Manchester) has spent the past several months meeting with environmental groups, housing advocates and others to create his bill, which would remove some local control from towns with the aim of making it easier to build homes.
Among other things, Bongartz’s bill, which he planned to introduce on Tuesday, would require towns to allow duplexes to be built anywhere that a single-family home is allowed — and fourplexes to be built in areas connected to water and sewer. Many towns now limit construction to one unit of housing per lot, with lot sizes varying widely.
Bongartz's bill would also set the parking space requirement for any unit of housing to just one, a measure aimed at easing permitting in smaller spaces. Many towns require that each unit have two spaces.
Bongartz said his goal is to clear the way for low- and moderate-income housing in downtown areas where there is open space and to steer development away from farm and forest areas to avoid fragmenting them.
“If we don’t make it easier to build in downtowns, we’re just going to end up with sprawl and houses in the wrong place," Bongartz said. He noted that Vermont has been working for more than two decades on smart growth principals and programs with the goal of reducing the reliance on cars and preserving open spaces. “Not doing this, in my view, would just be kind of sad.”
Sen. Kesha Ram Hinsdale (D-Chittenden-Southeast), chair of the Senate Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs Committee, plans to cosponsor a bill that is similar to Bongartz’s proposal. She said she'll introduce the proposal on Friday.
Related Expensive Housing Is Limiting Who Gets to Live Where in Vermont — and Clouds the State's Future: Locked Out Series, Part 12
The Vermont Housing Finance Agency estimates that the state needs 40,000 new units of housing by 2030, Bongartz said. Developers are building about 2,700 homes per year, many of them seasonal, he added, instead of the 5,000 to 6,000 needed to keep up with demand.
Rep. Katherine Sims (D-Craftsbury) also plans to introduce a housing bill this week. She'd like to exempt more of the state-designated downtown areas from Act 250, Vermont's land use planning law. That would lessen the power of a community appeal process that often halts development or reduces the size of projects considerably.
“We want to prevent [housing proposals] from being appealed forever or shrunk to a size that the numbers don’t pan out,” Sims said.
Communities would retain control of their downtowns through local zoning rules, she said. Under her bill, municipalities would need to adhere to those rules and not limit projects further.
“If the community has already decided the project is consistent with its vision for planning and development in the community, no one person or 10 people should be able to hold up a project,” she said.
Related Obstruction Zone: How Vermont’s Land-Use Regulations Impede New Development — and Complicate the State’s Housing Crisis: Locked Out Series, Part 2
"For decades, the state has told town planning commissions to thoughtfully plan in their towns and villages and cities, and now they’re saying, ‘We know what is best for your town or city,'" Brady said.
But Brady, like Sims, wants to see limits on appeals. He described the topic as a “third rail” of Vermont politics — one destined to generate outrage. He said his members consider housing a top priority and know the existing system has to change.
“You get some people together, they don’t like the color of the house, they don’t like the color of the person moving into that housing … and time after time, you see lost opportunity in the number of units," he said. "Obviously, the process is to blame for a lot of housing not being developed.”
While local opposition to new housing has been strong in many communities, Ram Hinsdale said she believes many people also welcome construction in village and town centers. People who need housing for themselves, for their employees or for grown children who want to return to Vermont are eager for change, she said, and their voices haven’t necessarily been heard.
Related House Impossible: How the Real Estate Rush and Other Factors Have Pushed Homeownership Out of Reach for Many Vermonters: Locked Out Series, Part 1
Sims said the issue is crucial to Vermont's future as a rural state.
"People are very alarmed by our housing crisis, and they want to see more affordable housing for low- and middle-income Vermonters," she said. "And what I hear is they want to see housing not on the top of a hill, not in a farm field, but in our more densely developed areas and our village centers."
Correction, January 17, 2022: A previous version of this story misreported the number of cosponsors for Ram Hinsdale's bill.
Comments are closed.
From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.
To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.
Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.