- Screenshot ©️ Seven Days
- Gov. Phil Scott
In his veto message, the governor repeated his concerns that the bill places too much of the responsibility for the standard in the hands of the Public Utilities Commission without proper oversight from the General Assembly. He also said the bill’s authors had not done enough research on its potential impact.
“What the Legislature has passed is a bill that includes some policy, with absolutely no details on costs and impacts, and a lot of authority and policy making delegated to the Public Utility Commission (PUC), an unelected board,” Scott wrote.
That law enables members of the public to sue the state if it fails to take sufficient steps toward cutting emissions by 15 percent by 2025, 40 percent by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050.
The bill would give the PUC until January 2024 to formulate the rules after at least six public hearings. Senators included a provision that would require legislators to be consulted before PUC rules are final. But that didn’t go far enough, Scott said Friday.
“Regardless of the latest talking points, the bill does not guarantee a full legislative deliberation on the policy, plan and fiscal implications prior to implementation,” he wrote.
The clean heat standard is a priority of the Democratic leadership, and several lawmakers expect to attempt to override Scott’s veto on Monday or Tuesday as the legislative session winds toward a close. An override requires a two-thirds majority vote that would be held first in the House.
House Speaker Jill Krowinski (D-Burlington) said the clean heat standard had been "the top recommendation of the Vermont Climate Council that we established in the Global Warming Solutions Act." She added, "We will continue to have conversations over the weekend, but my plan is to hold a veto override vote next week."
Advocates said they support an override.
“At a moment when most of the world’s leading climate scientists are, in effect, screaming ‘Now or never!’ on climate action, the Governor’s veto injects tremendous uncertainty ... when we urgently need decisive action,” Johanna Miller, energy and climate program director at the Vermont Natural Resources Council, said in a prepared statement. “I thank the Vermont House and Senate leaders who voted overwhelmingly to advance this bill, and I look forward to celebrating their successful override.”
Matt Cota, the executive director of the Vermont Fuel Dealers Association, said that the measure would be expensive, time-consuming and difficult to enforce.
"If this becomes law, every seller of oil heat, propane, kerosene, natural gas, and coal will have to register with the PUC, show how much fuel they bought, how much fuel they sold, where it came from, and where it was delivered," he said Friday.
If the veto is sustained, he said, lawmakers would have to find another way to meet the requirements of the Global Warming Solutions Act. But if the veto is overridden, he said, the state could be sued for failing to follow the requirements of the 2020 law.
“This is a challenging spot,” he said.
Also on Friday, the House voted unanimously to override the governor's May 2 veto of S.286, a state employees' pension reform package. The House speaker's office said the vote was the first time in Vermont history that both chambers voted unanimously to override a veto.
Correction, May 5, 2022: An earlier version of this story contained an incorrect date for the PUC's deadline to formulate rules. The story has been updated.