Letters to the Editor | Letters to the Editor | Seven Days | Vermont's Independent Voice

News » Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor


Published May 27, 2009 at 6:31 a.m.


After reading “Continuing Ed” [May 20], something did not sit right with me. I paced the house trying to parse out why my stomach felt unsettled. I am in favor of accountability for public officials and, conceptually, the topic of the performance of a state senator is fair game. However, the approach of the article did not feel fair to me toward Ed Flanagan the man.

Fundamentally, it is not fair to create an argument by exposing what amounts to selecting parts and pieces of one’s complicated and deeply personal health battle and some apparently representative workplace anecdotes for all to judge in limited column inches. The story, while interesting, lacked what I would have expected in terms of being driven by a strong thesis, backed up by numerous connected and well- researched facts. Rather, the article seemed to try to tie together a string of unusual activities on the part of Mr. Flanagan, combined with some evidence by some who basically posited that “he is not the same.” I don’t see how this approach merits going to press.

I know many smart people who talk to themselves, mumble, stretch their bodies in funny ways, selectively focus, and are forced to lie down due to back pain brought on by hours of deadly sitting. Perhaps Ed is different. Perhaps he is not performing as some expect. How is this different from any other senator? Your article should have been withheld until you had something more definitive to enlighten us with.

Emanuel Betz



I don’t know much about your publication, but this story is just great [“Fair Game,” April 15]. Gets to the nitty gritty. Keep up the good work!!

Clayton Cooke



Shay Totten makes some fair points about brinksmanship in his most recent column [“Fair Game: If at First You Don’t Succeed...” May 20]. But the biggest problem with the governor’s budget proposal isn’t political; it is policy.

Governor Douglas’ proposed budget is out of touch with reality and the needs of Vermonters. He proposes a massive shift from the general fund to the education fund. And, he would do away with property tax income sensitivity for almost 8000 middle-class Vermont families. If you think property taxes are bad now, just wait until the governor is through with you. We cannot afford Jim Douglas’ secret property tax hike. He’ll never talk about this out loud, but it’s all right there in his budget.

Add in massive job layoffs that he wants, cuts to unemployment benefits, and cuts to essential services to low-income families with kids and seniors, and you have a recipe for economic disaster. The governor’s proposed budget would add insult to injury for newly laid-off workers who struggle with daily expenses on greatly reduced income.

By contrast, the legislature came up with a compromise budget after much testimony from the public and experts on the issues. They made some cuts and, yes, raised some revenue, but overall it is a balanced plan. Call your legislators and tell them we can’t afford Jim Douglas’ secret property tax increase and his assault on the safety net for folks in need. Tell them to vote to override the governor’s veto on the budget.

Christopher J. Curtis


CORRECTION: Last week’s cover story about Senator Ed Flanagan contained an error in the subheadline. Flanagan’s car accident occurred three and a half years ago, not four and a half, as stated. We’ll use a calculator next time.

Speaking of Letters, feedback



Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.