- File: Mark Davis
- Vermont Supreme Court
The Vermont Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on October 22 in a case about the Burlington Telecom sale.
The Burlington City Council
approved the BT sale to Indiana-based Schurz Communications in 2017 for $30.8 million. The Vermont Public Utility Commission
approved the deal in February.
But a group of six citizen intervenors — Sandra Baird, Jared Carter, Dean Corren, Steven Goodkind, Solveig Overby and Shay Totten — say the city's $7 million net profit won't recoup the
$16.9 million in taxpayer funds that former mayor Bob Kiss diverted to keep the sinking telecom afloat. The group appealed the PUC decision in May.
The telecom, operating locally as Champlain Broadband, has already filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The court has not yet ruled on the motion, according to Burlington city attorney Eileen Blackwood.
The motion to dismiss argues the intervenors' case is moot because the BT sale has already closed, and "courts can only decide something that is an active and live controversy," Blackwood said.
In March, the intervenors filed a motion asking the utility commission to reconsider its approval of the sale. They argued that state law and the Burlington city charter protect taxpayers from being saddled with debt resulting from telecom sales.
The PUC ruled in April that the charter was immaterial and that telecom deals must only "promote the general good of the state.” In a press release Tuesday, intervenor Overby said the sale ignores the "public good, the public will and the law."
Blackwood said intervenors could have also asked the PUC for a stay, which may have halted the transaction.
"They didn't, so the sale went through," she said. "Now the case itself is moot. There’s nothing more to decide. It’s really final."
The intervenors disagree.
“Despite the great lengths the mayor and Schurz have gone to in order to give the impression that the deal is done, it is not,” Corren said in the press release. “The Supreme Court will decide."
Comments (3)
Showing 1-3 of 3
Comments are closed.
From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.
To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.
Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.