Critics Say Burlington Telecom Deal Shortchanges Taxpayers | Off Message

Critics Say Burlington Telecom Deal Shortchanges Taxpayers

by

burlingtontelecom.jpg
Several Burlington residents are asking regulators to halt the sale of Burlington Telecom because the proposed deal fails to return nearly $17 million in city funds diverted to the utility during 2008 and 2009.

“This deal is illegal,” said Dean Corren, a former candidate for lieutenant governor and one of the six citizens fighting the sale before state regulators.

The misappropriation of funds resulted in a scandal and caused the city’s credit rating to tank. Amid the political fallout, former mayor Bob Kiss didn't seek reelection, and Miro Weinberger captured the mayor's office.



Weinberger’s administration orchestrated a multiphase sale of the city-owned utility that would settle its debts and, according to city officials, minimize financial risks to taxpayers. First, Burlington Telecom was bought by Blue Water, a holding company owned by Lake Champlain ferry mogul Trey Pecor. While the city still manages the company, the sale agreement required officials to find a permanent owner to take over the enterprise.

Now that sale is in its final stage, with Schurz Communications and ZRF Partners planning to buy BT from Blue Water. Officials and critics are eagerly awaiting a ruling from the Vermont Public Utility Commission, which has the power to approve or reject the deal.

The citizens group is made up of members of Keep Burlington Telecom Local, which attempted to buy the firm. They say Weinberger and other city officials have turned their backs on the taxpayers whose money was lost.

“That deal basically sells the successful utility at a fire sale price and gets the city only $5 million out of the $16.9 million, at least, that’s owed to residents,” Corren said. “And then, in their most recent filing, [the city] basically said, ‘Well, the taxpayers had no right to that money anyway.’”

Weinberger has consistently said his administration was working to recover as much of the money as possible. He’s also been careful not to promise a specific amount.

In a 2015 press release announcing the completion of a settlement deal with BT creditor Citibank, Weinberger said the deal “creates a route for partial recovery over time of the $17 million of taxpayer money spent on BT prior to 2010.”

Now, lawyers for the city argue that a 2014 regulatory decision abandoned the premise that taxpayers will get all their money back. The city claimed in a November 2 filing with the Public Utility Commission that there is no requirement that officials recover the full $16.9 million.

“In fact, the Commission already approved the sale of Burlington Telecom’s assets to Blue Water in 2014, without … imposing the requirements that the Six Taxpayers now insist upon,” the filing said.

City attorney Eileen Blackwood emphasized in an interview that Burlington Telecom is no longer a taxpayer-owned utility.

“The assets of Burlington Telecom were sold to Blue Water in 2014, and the Public Utility Commission approved that," she said. "What we have is the ability to operate Burlington Telecom … and the ability to get some proceeds as a result of it. In other words, the deal is kind of already done. What we’re going through right now is the last piece of the deal.”

Corren and the other Burlingtonians say the deal violates Burlington’s city charter, which has the same legal force as a state law.

The charter says regulators considering any municipal utility case “shall ensure that any and all losses from these businesses, and, in the event these businesses are abandoned or curtailed, any and all costs associated with investment in cable television, fiber optic, and telecommunications network and telecommunications business-related facilities, are borne by the investors in such business, and in no event are borne by the City's taxpayers, the State of Vermont, or are recovered in rates from electric ratepayers.”



Blackwood said opponents' call on regulators to stop the deal would actually harm their cause, because the city's agreement with Blue Water will strip public officials of decision-making power if BT isn't sold soon.

She added that even though taxpayers might not get a $16.9 million return from the utility's sale, they're already saving money because of the improved credit ratings that come with putting the episode to rest.