Driver Saliva Testing Bill Dies in Vermont Senate Committee | Off Message

Driver Saliva Testing Bill Dies in Vermont Senate Committee


The vote means saliva testing likely won't become law this year. - LUKE EASTMAN
  • Luke Eastman
  • The vote means saliva testing likely won't become law this year.
A Senate committee voted down a bill Wednesday morning that would’ve allowed Vermont police to gather saliva samples from drivers suspected of driving while on drugs. The legislation would’ve allowed roadside collection of saliva samples, similar to the current use of breath tests for alcohol impairment.

The proposal was designed to help law enforcement check for stoned drivers once recreational marijuana becomes legal for adults in July.

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 4-1 against the bill, with Sen. Alice Nitka (D-Windsor) casting the lone vote in favor of it.

Committee chair Sen. Dick Sears (D-Bennington) said there are uncertainties surrounding saliva testing, which is still in its infancy and needs more work.

“My reason [for opposing the bill] was basically that the science isn’t there yet, and that I believe in a few years they will have a standardized test, particularly for marijuana, that would give us the amount that somebody would be impaired by,” Sears said.

Even once the technology is in place, Sears said he also has civil liberties concerns about police collecting bodily fluids without a warrant, an issue raised by the Vermont chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. He wants any law allowing saliva collection to require a warrant.

“I would be fine with the oral fluid test if there was a warrant, like we have for blood,” he said. “There’s a warrant [required] to take blood. It’s one thing to take a breath test, it’s another to take oral fluids or blood.”

The legislation, H.237, passed the House in March. The Senate Judiciary Committee’s no vote means it’s unlikely to become law this year.

Related Stories

Speaking of...


Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3


Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.