Vermont Senate Votes to Override Scott's Veto of Toxics Bill | Off Message

Vermont Senate Votes to Override Scott's Veto of Toxics Bill


  • File: Jeb Wallace-Brodeur
  • Sen. Tim Ashe
The Vermont Senate voted 22-8 Thursday to override Gov. Phil Scott’s veto of a bill that would expand state regulation of toxic chemicals in consumer products. The House is now expected to hold a vote next week that will decide whether the bill becomes law despite the governor’s objections.

Scott vetoed the bill, S.103, on Monday due to his concerns that the legislation would make the state less business-friendly without substantially improving public health. He specifically objected to a section of the bill that would give the commissioner of the Department of Health — a gubernatorial appointee — expanded power to require labeling or even ban the sale of products determined likely to expose children to harmful toxins.

There was no floor debate. In a statement after the vote, Senate President Pro Tempore Tim Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) said the law would allow the state to respond quickly to public health threats.

“Current law is bureaucratically cumbersome and the Legislature believes the Commissioner [of health] should be allowed to act quickly to protect our children from exposure to harmful chemicals,” Ashe said.

The vote closely followed party lines. Senators Joe Benning (R-Caledonia), Carolyn Branagan (R-Franklin), Randy Brock (R-Franklin), Brian Collamore (R-Rutland), Peg Flory (R-Rutland), Dick Mazza (D-Grand Isle), David Soucy (R-Rutland) and Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) voted against the bill.

The other senators voted in favor, clearing the two-thirds threshold required to override a governor’s veto.

The Vermont Public Interest Research Group applauded the Senate vote. "By standing up to the chemical companies and industry lobbyists hell-bent on killing this bill, they've taken a giant step toward making Vermont a safer place to raise a family," VPIRG executive director Paul Burns said in a statement.

In the House, the bill needs the support of two-thirds of the representatives present to pass. Otherwise, the veto will be sustained and the bill will not become law.

Disclosure: Tim Ashe is the domestic partner of Seven Days publisher and coeditor Paula Routly. Find our conflict-of-interest policy here:

Related Stories

Speaking of...


Comments (14)

Showing 1-14 of 14


Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.