AG Sessions Threatens Burlington, State Over Immigration Policies | Off Message

AG Sessions Threatens Burlington, State Over Immigration Policies


  • U.S. Marshals Service
  • Jeff Sessions
Updated on November 16, 2017.

The Justice Department threatened to cut federal funding for the state of Vermont and the city of Burlington in letters that warned each may be violating federal immigration law.

The government agency sent the letters Wednesday to 29 different jurisdictions "that may have laws, policies, or practices that violate 8 U.S.C. 1373, a federal statute that promotes information sharing related to immigration enforcement."

“Jurisdictions that adopt so-called ‘sanctuary policies’ also adopt the view that the protection of criminal aliens is more important than the protection of law-abiding citizens and of the rule of law,” U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement. “I urge all jurisdictions found to be potentially out of compliance in this preliminary review to reconsider their policies that undermine the safety of their residents."

The letters give each jurisdiction until December 8 to prove they're in compliance.

Vermont would lose nearly $500,000 in Byrne Justice Assistance Grants if found not in compliance, while Burlington would lose about $40,000 in federal funding, according to Sen. Patrick Leahy's (D-Vt.) office.

In a statement, Leahy blasted Sessions for the threat, calling it "shameful."

"I strongly believe that police chiefs and local leaders should decide what state and local policies are necessary and best to keep their communities safe — not an Attorney General who is attempting to extort immigration reform by cutting off vital public safety dollars to local communities and their residents," Leahy said.

Congressman Peter Welch (D-Vt.) chimed in with a dose of criticism for President Donald Trump on Wednesday night, saying the letter was an effort to "strong-arm" the state to submit to federal immigration policies. He urged the courts to block the decision.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) called the decision a way for Trump "to divide us up rather than go forward with comprehensive immigration reform."

"We cannot and do not want to live in a society where people are afraid to call the police to get the help they need because they are worried about the consequences for their own lives," Sanders said in a statement.

The Justice Department letter to Queen City Mayor Miro Weinberger takes specific aim at the Burlington Police Department's Fair and Impartial Policing Policy. In a retort Wednesday evening, Weinberger said that the BPD policy is in compliance and "we do not believe the federal law requires us to implement the current president’s draconian immigration policies.

"Regardless of who populates the administration in Washington, the federal government has no authority to deputize Burlington police officers to enforce federal civil immigration laws," Weinberger said in statement. "We will be responding to the letter by the deadline and forcefully arguing our case."

The Vermont letter, sent to Public Safety Commissioner Tom Anderson, attacks the state's Model Fair and Impartial Policing policy, which asks officers to avoid reporting the immigration status of victims or witnesses to the feds.

"We are confident we are compliant with federal law and worked closely with the legislature last year to ensure that," Gov. Phil Scott said in a statement Thursday.

Scott added that Sessions' letter cites an old version of the law, which was updated earlier this year.

Only two other states, as well as Washington, D.C., made the list. The rest are cities and counties, most of which are in California.

Related Stories

Speaking of...


Comments (20)

Showing 1-20 of 20


Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.