State Rejects Initial Application for Irasburg and Lowell Wind Project | Off Message

State Rejects Initial Application for Irasburg and Lowell Wind Project

by

A sign in Irasburg in December 2015 - FILE: IRASBURG RIDGELINE ALLIANCE
  • File: irasburg ridgeline alliance
  • A sign in Irasburg in December 2015
State regulators have dealt a blow to a proposed wind energy project on Kidder Hill in Irasburg and Lowell.

The Public Utility Commission issued a four-page ruling on Monday saying the application for the project, which was filed in June after years of debate, is incomplete and missing crucial information. The project calls for two turbines capable of powering 2,000 homes.

But the commission said central information, including specific locations of the turbines and an access road, an assessment of natural resources in the area, and whether blasting will occur, is missing.

The commission said it considers the application to have never been filed, forcing the project's backer, AllEarth Renewables CEO David Blittersdorf, to begin the process again.

Many local residents have bitterly opposed the project.

The ruling comes as the state considers proposed new regulations that would make it more difficult to build large wind projects. A legislative panel has put off deciding on the proposed rules until late October.

Gov. Phil Scott opposes industrial wind projects on ridgelines.

Blittersdorf, who owns the site of the proposed project, said in an email to Seven Days that "we will be responding and will address completely each and every item in this ruling."

Related Stories

Speaking of...

Tags

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

 

Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.