Scott Struggles to Articulate Immigrant Deportation Stance | Off Message

Scott Struggles to Articulate Immigrant Deportation Stance


Gov. Phil Scott at a Thursday press conference - TERRI HALLENBECK
  • Terri Hallenbeck
  • Gov. Phil Scott at a Thursday press conference
Gov. Phil Scott was trying Thursday afternoon, he said, to clarify his position on undocumented immigrants when he proceeded to do exactly the opposite.

At his weekly press conference in his ceremonial Statehouse office, Vermont's Republican governor made clear he believed that undocumented immigrants convicted of a crime should be deported. He was less clear about what he meant by the word "crime."

The subject came up when WCAX-TV reporter Kyle Midura questioned Scott about public records revealed in this week's Seven Days. The story showed that, in 2016, the Vermont Department of Motor Vehicles regularly shared information with federal immigration enforcement officials about suspected undocumented immigrants. It also described an incident last September when the Vermont State Police arrested a Honduran national for drunk driving and then turned him over to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

What ensued at the press conference was a surreal display. Scott declined to address the question that was asked — instead providing an answer that ended up confusing himself.

“Do you see a distinction between state police reporting someone suspected of drunk driving at more than two times the legal limit to [federal authorities] and someone who is simply applying for a license here in the state?” Midura asked. Three years ago, the state enacted a law allowing undocumented immigrants to legally seek a driver's license without granting the recipient legal immigration status.

“Maybe I can clear this up by saying what I think should happen,” Scott replied. “If someone is convicted of a criminal act, a crime, and they are an undocumented immigrant, I think they should be deported."

Midura: “But only upon conviction?”

Scott: “Right.”

Peter Hirschfeld of Vermont Public Radio: “Of any crime?”

Scott: “A crime, a felony crime, a crime egregious.”

Hirschfeld: “Is it any felony crime? Is it violent felony crimes? How bad a crime does it have to be for somebody to be worthy of deportation?”

Scott: “If you’re convicted of a criminal activity, they should be deported.”

Seven Days: “Criminal activity could be a misdemeanor, couldn’t it?”

Scott: “Well, now you’re getting maybe above my pay grade.”

Seven Days: “We’re just checking. You said felony.”

Scott: “I just want to be clear … Those who are involved in criminal activity and they’re convicted of such and are undocumented, I believe should be deported.”

Hirschfeld: “DUI?”

Scott: “Yeah.”

Some driving under the influence convictions are misdemeanors.

Later in the press conference, Hirschfeld sought more clarity. He asked if it was correct to say, “Gov. Phil Scott believes that anybody who’s in this country illegally should be deported if they have been convicted of a crime.”

“If they’re convicted of an egregious crime," Scott replied.

Hesitating and realizing he didn't know where he meant to draw the line, he promised to get back to the assembled reporters on what level of crime would warrant deportation. “In my mind, I’m talking about a criminal act of violence, of public safety,” he said.

Scott spokeswoman Rebecca Kelley did not provide that clarifying information late Thursday.

As tortured as the response was, Scott appears to have said that there is, indeed, a difference between the state's willingness to turn over an undocumented immigrant convicted of driving drunk and one who is applying for a driver’s license.

With a simple "yes," he could have avoided offering up an opinion he had not really solidified.

Speaking of...


Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6


Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.