Judge: McAllister Can Withdraw Plea in Sexual Assault Case | Off Message

Judge: McAllister Can Withdraw Plea in Sexual Assault Case


Norm McAllister, right, is shown with his former attorney Brooks McArthur in court. - FILE: TERRI HALLENBECK
  • Norm McAllister, right, is shown with his former attorney Brooks McArthur in court.
A Vermont Superior Court judge approved former state senator Norm McAllister’s request to withdraw from a plea agreement in his sexual assault case.

The decision, issued Thursday morning by Judge Martin Maley in St. Albans, means McAllister will stand trial on two misdemeanor counts of prohibited acts and one felony charge of sexual assault.

The former Franklin County legislator could face up to life in prison if convicted of the sexual assault charge.

McAllister agreed to plead no contest in January to amended charges of lewd and lascivious conduct and two counts of prohibited acts. He could have served up to seven years under the agreement. The agreement came together on the eve of trial, after a full day of jury selection.

In the following days, McAllister fired his legal team. His new attorney, Bob Katims, filed a motion to withdraw the plea. McAllister, during a February hearing on the motion to withdraw, alleged that his previous attorneys, Brooks McArthur and David Williams, “browbeat” him into taking the deal.

“There was no doubt in my mind that this was in his best interest,” McArthur said on the stand, of the state’s “strong” evidence during a February 24 hearing. He described a tape of a telephone conversation between McAllister and his alleged victim as “devastating.”

Maley found the testimony of McAllister’s former counsel “credible,” but the judge’s 10-page ruling concludes that McAllister showed “a fair and just cause for the withdrawal of his plea.”

“The matter will be scheduled on the next available pretrial and jury draw,” Maley wrote in his order.

Katims said Thursday he was pleased with the decision but had not yet discussed it with his client. The attorney declined to discuss evidence or trial strategy but said he remained confident the court could find a jury that would fairly decide the case, despite its high publicity.

“Mr. McAllister maintains his innocence and is entitled to his trial and is looking forward to having his day in court,” Katims said.

Here’s the judge’s full decision:

Did you appreciate this story?

Show us your ❤️ by becoming a Seven Days Super Reader.

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Add a comment

Seven Days moderates comments in order to ensure a civil environment. Please treat the comments section as you would a town meeting, dinner party or classroom discussion. In other words, keep commenting classy! Read our guidelines...

Note: Comments are limited to 300 words.