After Second Recount, Ainsworth Defeats Buxton by One Vote | Off Message

After Second Recount, Ainsworth Defeats Buxton by One Vote

by

Vermont Statehouse - JEB WALLACE-BRODEUR
  • Jeb Wallace-brodeur
  • Vermont Statehouse
It took two recounts and more than a month, but the race between Republican David Ainsworth of Royalton and incumbent Rep. Sarah Buxton (D-Tunbridge) has finally been decided.

Ainsworth won by one vote — 1,004 to 1,003.

The tables have turned: Six years ago, it was Buxton who defeated Ainsworth by just one vote.

Buxton and Vermont Republican Party executive director Jeff Bartley both confirmed this year’s results Wednesday evening. A second recount in the race took all day at the Windsor County Courthouse in 
David Ainsworth - FILE
  • File
  • David Ainsworth
Woodstock. After a previous recount, the two were tied at 1,000 votes each, but Wednesday’s recount included four votes for him and three for her that were examined closely for voter intent, Buxton said. The machine couldn’t read the marks on those seven ballots, but after looking at them closely, both sides agreed on what the voters meant.

Buxton said Wednesday night that she was satisfied the recount was thorough, though she was sad not to be returning to the legislature in January.

“The first thing I did was I hugged David,” Buxton said of her rival. “I said, ‘Now, it’s your turn.’”

Sarah Buxton
  • Sarah Buxton
Buxton served six years in the House after defeating then-incumbent Ainsworth in 2010 by one vote. There was a recount that year, too. In 2012, Buxton prevailed again over Ainsworth, by 199 votes. In 2014, she won by 66 votes.

Will there be a rematch in 2018? Buxton said she didn’t know. “It’s going to take a little bit of processing,” she said.

Related Stories

Speaking of...

Tags

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

 

Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.