House Joins Call for Divestment from Coal and ExxonMobil | Off Message

House Joins Call for Divestment from Coal and ExxonMobil


Rep. Mary Sullivan (D-Burlington), lead sponsor of a  resolution calling for pension funds to divest fossil fuel stocks, addresses the House. - NANCY REMSEN
  • Nancy Remsen
  • Rep. Mary Sullivan (D-Burlington), lead sponsor of a resolution calling for pension funds to divest fossil fuel stocks, addresses the House.
In a largely party-line vote, the House approved a resolution Friday urging the state treasurer and the Vermont Pension Investment Committee to take steps for the state’s pension funds to divest their coal and ExxonMobil stocks. The vote: 76-57.

The resolution supports the call for divestment that Gov. Peter Shumlin made in his State of the State address in January. He appealed directly to the Vermont Pension Investment Committee earlier this week.

Treasurer Beth Pearce has argued that decisions about how pension money is invested should be based on financial factors, not politics. But after Shumlin addressed the investment committee, she and VPIC agreed to look into possible divestment of coal and ExxonMobil stocks.

The House resolution focused on both the climate change and financial arguments for divesting from fossil fuel assets. It noted, for example, that a growing number of coal companies are filing for bankruptcy.

“The carbon sector has been tanking,” Rep. Willem Jewett (D-Ripton) argued during debate on the resolution. “We should be a little concerned about that.”

Republicans countered that the legislature shouldn’t be telling the state treasurer how to do her job. “We should trust our state treasurer and pension board to do their due diligence,” said Rep. Job Tate (R-Mendon).

Tate offered an amendment that affirmed the responsibility of the treasurer and investment committee to make prudent investment decisions. It stripped out any references to coal and ExxonMobil, saying only that the legislature encourages investments “that result in the best possible yield on the taxpayers' dollars.”

“I see the amendment as gutting the resolution,” said Rep. Jim McCullough (D-Williston). A majority of the House agreed, and Tate’s amendment failed, 79-54.

Rep. Patti Komline (R-Dorset) suggested that if lawmakers wanted to start directing investment decisions, they also ought to look at companies with records of human rights violations. Her amendment called for the treasurer to provide the legislature with a list of these companies by next January. The House rejected the amendment on a voice vote.

Rep. Oliver Olsen (I-Londonderry) offered an amendment for the state to demonstrate a visible commitment to reduced carbon emissions. He proposed converting the parking space on the east side of the Statehouse, which is reserved for the governor’s large sport utility vehicle, into a  charging station for plug-in electric vehicles. Olsen said he has an electric car and has trouble finding a spot where he can recharge it.

Rep. Mary Sullivan (D-Burlington), lead sponsor of the resolution, said Olsen had a valid point, but argued that the parking space request wasn’t relevant to the divestment question. The House rejected Olsen’s amendment on a voice vote.

Sullivan said the resolution urging divestment was a compromise. Some lawmakers wanted a bill that would have mandated divestment.

Austin Robert Davis, policy and communications coordinator for 350 Vermont, an organization that has pushed for divestment, welcomed the resolution even though it is non-binding. He called it an appropriate way for the legislature to weigh in.

The governor applauded the House resolution. “The time for debate is over,” Shumlin said in a statement after the vote. “Let’s protect our retirees and public employees from owning assets that have a bleak economic future.”

The resolution will be forwarded to the treasurer. It wasn’t a joint resolution, so it won’t go to the Senate. The Senate Government Operations Committee has taken testimony but not yet voted on a divestment bill.

Did you appreciate this story?

Show us your ❤️ by becoming a Seven Days Super Reader.

Add a comment

Seven Days moderates comments in order to ensure a civil environment. Please treat the comments section as you would a town meeting, dinner party or classroom discussion. In other words, keep commenting classy! Read our guidelines...

Note: Comments are limited to 300 words.