McAllister's Attorney Wants Two Separate Trials | Off Message

McAllister's Attorney Wants Two Separate Trials

by

Sen. Norm McAllister (R-Franklin) - TERRI HALLENBECK
  • Terri Hallenbeck
  • Sen. Norm McAllister (R-Franklin)
A lawyer for Sen. Norm McAllister (R-Franklin) says he plans to seek two separate trials for his client, who is charged with sexual assault.

Defense attorney Brooks McArthur would like the first one to cover allegations that McAllister forced his Statehouse assistant to have sex with him. “I find her story to be the most incredible,” said McArthur, contending the alleged victim has given different accounts of the timing of the assaults, and that legislators have said in sworn depositions that the woman never indicated anything was amiss.

McAllister is also accused of coercing a woman who worked on his Highgate farm to have sex with him in exchange for rent. A third woman who has since died was allegedly propositioned. Criminal charges involving those two women would be addressed in a second trial, if a judge agrees, McArthur said.

McAllister, 64, of Highgate Springs, was arrested last May as the legislature was completing the 2015 session. He pleaded not guilty to three felony counts of sexual assault and three misdemeanor counts of prohibited acts. When the legislature reconvened in January, his Senate colleagues suspended him while the charges remain pending.

In a phone interview about his legal strategy, McArthur said he expects the Franklin County State’s Attorney’s Office to oppose separate trials, but he argued it would be more fair for McAllister. “If a jury hears about multiple incidents, it’s more likely they’ll go along with it,” McArthur said.

Diane Wheeler, Franklin County deputy state's attorney, did not return a call about the case.

Jury selection is set for May 10, and the trial should start within days of that, according to McArthur.

The defense attorney said he will argue that McAllister never forced sex on anyone.

Whether his charges are tried together or separately, McAllister is likely to go on trial at about the time legislators are finishing the 2016 session. McArthur said the timing was coincidental, and, even if the session runs long, the trial will go on. As many as eight legislators could be called to testify about the charges related to McAllister’s Statehouse assistant.

Legislators who shared McAllister’s Montpelier apartment —  Sen. Kevin Mullin (R-Rutland) and Rep. Tim Corcoran (D-Bennington) — gave sworn depositions last November that they never saw any indication the woman was under duress, McArthur said. Rep. Corey Parent (R-St. Albans) said that when he gave the alleged victim rides home to Franklin County, she never raised any concerns about McAllister, McArthur said.

McArthur said attorneys still have to question other witnesses and the alleged victims. The state’s attorney’s office, which has already subpoenaed Seven Days reporter Mark Davis, last week added Vermont Public Radio reporter Peter Hirschfeld to the list of possible witnesses, McArthur said.

McArthur said that when he questions McAllister’s former assistant, he will be looking to clarify when she claims the alleged assaults started. In an affidavit, police indicated she said it was after she graduated — presumably from high school, when she would have been 18. In an interview with Seven Days political editor Paul Heintz, she claimed to be 15 or 16.

“We have evidence Norm McAllister didn’t even know her, well into her 16th year,” McArthur said.

Seven Days successfully quashed the state’s attorney’s subpoena for Heintz to be deposed. McArthur said that he may try to question Heintz to show that the assistant has told different stories.

Speaking of...

Tags

Comments

Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.