Income-Based Residential Property Tax System Proposed for All | Off Message

Income-Based Residential Property Tax System Proposed for All

by

4 comments
Rep. Chris Pearson (P-Burlington) and other lawmakers offering a property tax relief measure - NANCY REMSEN
  • Nancy Remsen
  • Rep. Chris Pearson (P-Burlington) and other lawmakers offering a property tax relief measure
 Thirty-five Democratic and Progressive lawmakers have proposed that Vermont's residential property owners pay education taxes based on their incomes — expanding a system in place for many state residents.

Rep. Chris Pearson (P-Burlington) said the bill would increase the fairness of the school tax by asking higher-income Vermonters to pay the same share of their pay as middle-income property owners. Vermonters with $100,000 in household income now pay about 3 percent of their wages in property taxes, compared to 0.5 percent for households with income of $1 million, he said.

“We believe we have a way to make our school funding more equitable and, at the same time, give most Vermonters a break on their property taxes,” said Sen. Anthony Pollina (D/P-Washington), sponsor of the Senate version of the bill.

Currently, the income-based system covers only taxpayers with household incomes of $90,000 or less and only for a house and two acres. Residential property owners with more than two acres pay an additional amount based on the property’s value.

The proposal would raise an additional $82 million, all of which would be used to provide residential property tax relief. Half of that would make it possible for property owners with incomes less than $90,000 and extra acreage to pay based only on their incomes. The remaining $41 million would be used to reduce the tax rate for all residential property owners.

Taxes on commercial and vacation properties would still be based on their value.

The new bills join more than two dozen other proposals to alter the property tax system for financing schools.

Rep. Janet Ancel (D-Calais), chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, which reviews tax bills, said the panel might consider the new proposal. She said she would want to see an analysis of who would pay more and who would pay less. “I don’t want to adopt a system that is less progressive than what we have now,” Ancel said.

Senate Finance chair Tim Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) said his committee already had a “walk-through” of Pollina’s version of the bill. He said it would be part of a broader discussion of property taxes that the Finance Committee will undertake this session.  


Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment
 

Add a comment

Seven Days moderates comments in order to ensure a civil environment. Please treat the comments section as you would a town meeting, dinner party or classroom discussion. In other words, keep commenting classy! Read our guidelines...

Note: Comments are limited to 300 words.