Revolt Brewing Over Tax Bill in Vermont House | Off Message

Revolt Brewing Over Tax Bill in Vermont House


House Speaker Shap Smith speaks Wednesday to the  Working Vermonters' Caucus. - TERRI HALLENBECK
  • Terri Hallenbeck
  • House Speaker Shap Smith speaks Wednesday to the Working Vermonters' Caucus.
A day before House members were due to debate the state budget and tax packages, a revolt was brewing Wednesday among liberals lunching on pizza in a Statehouse meeting room.

If they stick together, they can join most of the House Republicans and independents to defeat the tax bill, which would give them leverage over the future of the tax and budget bills, members argued.  “This is our first chance to make a statement,” said Rep. Chris Pearson (P- Burlington), a member of the legislature's Working Vermonters' Caucus.

And House Speaker Shap Smith (D-Morristown) knew the threat was real. He took a walk down to the caucus' noontime meeting. “I know that people have real concerns about the budget,” Smith told the caucus. “I want people to understand there are a lot of things that we’re doing that are good in that budget.”

In front of this group —  about 25 Progressives and liberal Democrats upset that the budget cuts $53 million from state programs and includes $10.8 million in personnel savings — Smith emphasized that the budget is actually growing. The general fund budget is up 4.8 percent, he noted. That’s a number he would undoubtedly downplay if he’d been talking to Republicans. Instead, he was trying to sell this crowd on the fact that despite all the talk of cuts, the budget merely curbs the level of increase.

Rep. Mark Woodward (D-Johnson) was unimpressed with the math, noting that the overall budget is up only 1.3 percent. “That’s the squeeze. That’s why I’m having trouble with the budget,” he said. “That’s less than inflation.”

When Smith was done talking, the group politely applauded. Smith left the room and members launched into a strategy to torpedo the $35 million tax bill. If they defeat the tax bill, they’ll have more sway in changing the budget bill that relies on the tax bill money, Pearson said.

Members of the caucus will offer amendments Thursday with alternative tax options, Pearson said. If none of those passes, he said, he hopes members will stick together and combine forces with Republicans to defeat the tax bill.

The group will likely be looking to pass one of these options: a $2-per-room hotel occupancy tax, which would raise about $10 million; or increasing the income tax on the highest-earning two tiers of Vermonters, which would raise about $12 million.

The group wants to use the money to replace $5.8 million in payroll cuts included in the budget, as well as to restore funding to low-income heating assistance, Reach Up and Working Lands programs.

“This is the first time, I think, we are asking our caucus to really up the ante and actually take a stand and vote no on a revenue bill,” said Rep. Joey Donovan (D-Burlington), the Working Vermonters' Caucus co-leader. “We really think this is the time that we need to stand up and say, ‘OK, if we can’t get new revenues tomorrow, we will be voting no on the revenue bill.’”

Donovan voted for the tax bill as a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, but she said she will vote against the bill on the House floor if the amendments fail.

She asked caucus members for a show of hands of who was in. Twelve votes would be enough alongside Republicans and independents who are likely to vote against the tax bill, Pearson said. Some members shifted uncomfortably in their chairs. Some walked out of the meeting. In the end, 13 hands went up.

House Minority Leader Don Turner (R-Milton) said later Wednesday that most of his 53 members will be voting against the tax bill Thursday. Their opposition is 180 degrees from that of the Working Vermonters' Caucus. "Our caucus is opposed to raising new  taxes," Turner said.

Speaking of...



Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.