Judge Says Vermont Law School Can Cover Controversial Murals | Live Culture

Judge Says Vermont Law School Can Cover Controversial Murals


  • Khwaneigq | Dreamstime.com
In an order last week, a judge denied a preliminary injunction filed by artist Sam Kerson to stop his mural at Vermont Law School from being covered on the grounds that covering it would violate a federal statute protecting artwork. Kerson, the judge wrote on March 10, “is unlikely to succeed on the merits in this case.”

VLS is free to install acoustic panels on a frame in front of the mural, which the school says will not touch or damage the painting in any way. Kerson, who filed suit in December in U.S. District Court, wanted to halt that construction for the duration of the trial.

His attorneys argued in a hearing on February 24 that it was unknown whether this installation could cause deterioration over time due to lack of air circulation, and further contended that permanently removing the mural from public viewing would violate the Visual Artists Rights Act, 1990 federal law that protects an artist's work from "intentional distortion, mutilation, or other modification.”

The VLS attorneys countered that the school is not obligated to display the murals under VARA, just as the owner of a painting is not obligated to keep it hanging on a wall.

Chief Judge Geoffrey Crawford ruled that Kerson’s attorneys hadn’t provided evidence that covering the mural in this manner would harm it, and wrote that it was unlikely that Kerson would prevail in his case, as the protections of VARA “do not prohibit the actions proposed by VLS.”

VLS first announced in July that it would remove Kerson’s controversial mural depicting scenes of enslaved people, slave owners, abolitionists and the Underground Railroad. The two panels, titled "Vermont, the Underground Railroad" and "Vermont and the Fugitive Slave,” were painted by Kerson in 1993 and 1994 in the school's Chase Community Center, with outside funding. According to court filings, debates about it had been happening at the school since at least early 2013, and a student petition in the summer of 2020 inspired the law school's action.

Initially, the mural was going to be painted over. Kerson objected, and removal of the mural was considered, but the work is painted directly on sheetrock and carpenters determined it couldn’t be moved without being damaged.

While the mural is subject to protections under VARA and the statute does prevent its removal, Crawford wrote, concealment does not constitute modification or destruction.

VLS attorneys had previously filed a motion to dismiss the case, which Crawford converted into a motion for summary judgment, which would allow him to make a final determination without a full trial. Should the judge rule against him, Kerson will have the opportunity to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Through a PR representative, the VLS attorneys declined to comment. Kerson's attorney, Steven Hyman, told the Valley News that he was disappointed in the judge's order and that his team is "exploring how best to continue Sam’s efforts to keep these recognized and acclaimed murals visible."

"7 Daze - The Arts Desk" by Sam Kerson - COURTESY OF SAM KERSON
  • Courtesy of Sam Kerson
  • "7 Daze - The Arts Desk" by Sam Kerson
Kerson, who lives in Québec, declined to comment when reached by email, citing dissatisfaction with Seven Days’ previous reporting on the mural case. He attached a caricature of this reporter.

Kerson had previously granted one-time permission for Seven Days to include photos of the mural with an article. He denied permission for this article. The VLS representative said that the school doesn’t have any photos of the mural.

Related Stories

Related Locations

Speaking of...



Comments are closed.

From 2014-2020, Seven Days allowed readers to comment on all stories posted on our website. While we've appreciated the suggestions and insights, right now Seven Days is prioritizing our core mission — producing high-quality, responsible local journalism — over moderating online debates between readers.

To criticize, correct or praise our reporting, please send us a letter to the editor or send us a tip. We’ll check it out and report the results.

Online comments may return when we have better tech tools for managing them. Thanks for reading.